Our Mailing List

* indicates required

Just for Subscribing

Subscribe to our email list above and receive a free copy of Jubilee Circles. Just click on the Download link in your Welcome Email. Paperback copies are available from Amazon for $5.99.

Follow us on Facebook

Subscribe to OEP Updates

« Getting Beyond Dualism of Economics vs. Religion, Money & Spirituality »

Dualistic thinking keeps Spirit and Matter separate in the MultiEarth view of the world. I mean really SEPARATE—with a hard bold line between them! OneEarth thinking, on the other hand, sees a world in which Matter is infused with Spirit. In OneEarth consciousness, as in quantum physics, Matter and Spirit are as difficult to separate as wave and particle are in defining light.

That gets me to how OneEarth consciousness thinks of economics and religion. For most of my life economics and religion have been as separate as baseball and gardening. It’s not true for me anymore, but in a group I met with recently some challenged my description of the economy as religion. We were discussing pages 31-54 in my book Blinded by Progress, where, I propose, that we must stop giving religious devotion to MultiEarth economics. Only by changing that practice can we assure any kind of continuing inhabitability for our planet as we know it.

Here’s my question for you, blog readers, if you’d have been in that group, you’d have heard the following conversation. I’d like to hear your thoughts on what you’d have said in the group:

One person protested, “I can see similarities between how the economy functions and religion, but I don’t see that the economy is a religion.”

“In which ways do you see religion being significantly different from the MultiEarth economy?” I inquired.

“For one thing,” came the reply,”there’s nothing supernatural in economics. No supernatural deity intervenes in economics.”

The next day as I thought about this reluctance to see the MultiEarth economy as religion, I reminded myself how reluctant I’d been to do so only a few years ago. Economics and religion were sealed off from one another in separate rooms of my mind. Business people I knew who were part of religious congregations likewise kept economics and religion separate. Dualism reigned. Supernatural and natural? The same thing. Separate rooms. The one requires faith, the other acquires certainty through data and facts. One is spiritual, the other is material. 

Even though dualistic thinking has wounded our planet horribly and killed thousands of species, we’re so accustomed to it that we resist getting beyond it. So, readers, what do you think? Does recognizing MultiEarth economics as a world religion get us beyond dualistic illusions into a holistic breakthrough that’s transformative for our planet? Theologians Buddhist David Loy and Christian Harvey Cox do. Or is it just a quaint analogy?

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (49)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (2)

If one believes that to be a religion there needs to be a supernatural dimension then there will always be a divide.
April 17, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterDonna Lindsey
I have been drawn to pan-en-theism for some time. Not pantheism, but panentheism. The "en" make a great difference because, while the focus is on the Divine being immanent in all that is, there's also the sense that in how the universe functions there is something more. That "more" is also Divine. This gets away from supernatural interventions in the natural, but it still embraces a pretty majestic polarity between the immanent and transcendent—not the same kind of split, however, that supernatural-natural have become. Since polarities are everywhere in the world, I'm not at all in favor of being rid of them. Like the negative and positive of an energy cell, some polarities give us the transcending energy. I like Mechtild, the woman mystic of the Rhinelands (13th century): "The day of my spiritual awakening was the day I saw and I knew I saw God in all things and all things in God." I get it.
April 22, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterLee Van Ham

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.